How to Choose an AI Meeting Recording Tool: 2026 Hands-On Comparison of Tongyi Tingwu, Feishu Miaoji, and iFlytek Hear

How to Choose an AI Meeting Recording Tool: 2026 Hands-On Comparison of Tongyi Tingwu, Feishu Miaoji, and iFlytek Hear

It takes one hour to hold a meeting and two hours to compile the minutes. This is a common worry for many people in the workplace. Speech-to-text, speaker distinction, automatic summarization, and to-do extraction, these tasks that originally required manual playback to be completed can now be handed over to AI meeting recording tools to get the first draft within a few minutes of the meeting ending. The problem is that there are more and more products on the market. The domestic mainstream ones include Alibaba's Tongyi Tingwu, ByteDance's Feishu Miaoji, and iFlytek's iFlytek Hear. The three companies have different backgrounds, positioning, and scenarios they specialize in. This article puts these three together for a horizontal review to help you find the more suitable one according to your own usage habits.

What pain points do AI meeting minutes solve?

There are several unavoidable problems in the traditional way of recording meetings. First, the speed cannot keep up. People speak much faster than they type, and the person taking notes can often only focus on the key points and miss the details; second, the cost of post-meeting organization is high, and playing back the recording is equivalent to reopening the meeting; third, responsibilities are unclear, and no one can remember all the to-do items agreed at the meeting afterward.

The core value of AI meeting recording tools lies in automating this link. It first converts speech into text in real time, then distinguishes different speakers based on voiceprints or speaking rhythms, and finally uses a large model to summarize the entire content, refine key points, and extract to-dos. Ideally, as soon as the meeting is over you'll have time-stamped, role-specific minutes complete with conclusions. What saves time for individuals is the sorting out, and what accumulates for teams is retrievable, traceable knowledge assets. Because of this, transcription accuracy, speaker distinction, summary quality, and ecosystem access have become the most noteworthy dimensions when selecting tools.

Tongyi Tingwu: An all-round player backed by Alibaba's ecosystem

Tongyi Tingwu is an AI recording and organizing tool launched by Alibaba. Its underlying layer is connected to the large model capabilities of the Tongyi series. It is positioned as a general-purpose tool, capable of processing not only meeting recordings but also the transcription and summarization of audio and video files, lectures, interviews, and other scenarios.

Its most widely recognized feature is its integration with the Alibaba ecosystem. DingTalk is a widely used office platform within the Alibaba system, and Tongyi Tingwu has natural advantages in connecting meetings, documents, cloud drives and other links. If the enterprise itself is already using Alibaba Cloud or DingTalk, the access cost is relatively low. At the functional level, Tongyi Tingwu provides capabilities such as real-time transcription, speaker identification, chapter overview, full-text summary, to-do and keyword extraction, and also supports structured organization of long audio and video. For users who often deal with external audio and video materials, not just meetings, its applicability is relatively wider.

Feishu Miaoji: A native component in collaboration scenarios

Feishu Miaoji is the meeting recording function in the Feishu office suite owned by ByteDance. Unlike the first two, which are relatively independent products, Miaoji has been part of Feishu's collaboration system from the beginning, which determines that its biggest feature is its seamless integration into the workflow.

When you hold a video conference in Feishu, the system will automatically generate a note after it ends, including the transcribed content, speakers, and timeline. Team members can directly comment on the note, quote snippets, and link it to documents or tasks. This idea of using meeting minutes as collaborative documents is what distinguishes Feishu Miaoji from other tools. Its AI capabilities also cover intelligent summarization, key point extraction, and to-do identification, and these outputs can be easily transferred into Feishu documents, multi-dimensional tables, or task systems. For teams that already use Feishu as their main office platform, Miaoji has almost zero additional cost; but if you don't use Feishu, it's not very convenient to use it alone as a general transcription tool.

iFlytek Hear: A specialist in the field of speech recognition

iFlytek Hear comes from iFlytek, which has been deeply involved in the field of Chinese speech recognition for many years. This is widely recognized in the industry. iFlytek Hear is the result of productizing this accumulated technology, focusing on the most basic and critical thing of all: transcription.

It is generally considered to have relatively solid performance in aspects such as Chinese speech-to-text, dialect and accent adaptation, and recognition in noisy environments. In addition to the software, iFlytek also has a supporting recording hardware ecosystem. After a recording is made with a recorder pen, it can be transcribed directly and synchronously. This link that combines software and hardware is a relatively unique feature. Functionally, iFlytek Hear provides real-time transcription, speaker identification, subtitles, summaries, etc., and also supports multiple languages and translation. Its character is more like that of a dedicated transcription tool. Whoever has a strong voice foundation and can transcribe accurately will be more reassuring in many serious scenarios. This is the impression that iFlytek has always given to the outside world.

How to view transcription accuracy and speaker distinction

Transcription accuracy is the foundation of meeting recording tools, but a word of caution: there is no one-size-fits-all number for accuracy. It is highly dependent on audio quality, accent, terminology density, and the live environment. Any statement about specific percentages that is divorced from the scenario must be questioned. Only qualitative judgments are made here.

The three companies generally perform well under standard Mandarin and clear recording conditions. With iFlytek's long-term accumulation in speech recognition, iFlytek Hear is generally more reassuring in dialects, accents and complex noise environments; Tongyi Tingwu and Feishu Miaoji can also provide usable transcription results in regular meeting scenarios. In terms of speaker distinction, all three are supported, but the accuracy is also affected by the scene. For example, when several people have similar voices and talk over each other, the distinction will often be biased. This is a common difficulty in the industry and is not a unique shortcoming of any one company. In actual use, it is recommended to treat AI transcription as a high-quality first draft, and the key conclusions still need to be reviewed manually.

Live subtitles and the on-site experience

The value of real-time subtitles is that you can see the text while the meeting is in progress, making it easier for the hearing-impaired to participate, facilitating cross-language communication, and helping you quickly catch up with the progress after being distracted. All three tools provide real-time transcription and subtitle capabilities, and the difference is more reflected in the form of use.

The real-time recording of Feishu Miaoji lives naturally inside Feishu meetings. It records as soon as the meeting is in progress, providing the most coherent experience. Tongyi Tingwu supports real-time transcription of meetings and can also be connected to corresponding office scenarios. iFlytek Hear has a lot of practical experience in scenarios such as on-site transcription and subtitle projection, and is often used in offline events, lectures, and trainings. If your need is real-time subtitles for large-scale offline events, products with a professional transcription background such as iFlytek Hear are often more suitable; if it is a regular online team meeting, solutions embedded in collaboration platforms are more worry-free to use.

The difference between AI summary and to-do extraction

Condensing an hour of recording into a few key points and a few to-dos is the link where large models can best demonstrate their value, and it is also where the competition for such tools will be fiercest in 2026. All three companies list smart summarization, chapter division, key point extraction, and to-do identification as standard features. The overall direction is the same. The difference lies in the granularity and degree of structuring of the summary, and the connection with subsequent work.

Tongyi Tingwu is backed by the Tongyi large model, which performs well in structuring long content and is suitable for splitting a lengthy audio or video into clear chapters. The advantage of Feishu Miaoji is not that the summary itself is amazing, but that after the summary is produced, it can be directly transferred into documents, tasks, and forms, closing the loop smoothly. iFlytek Hear's summary capabilities are also continuing to improve. Combined with its solid transcription foundation, the reliability of the overall output is not bad. What needs to be made clear is that no matter which company, the AI-generated to-do list may have omissions or misjudgments. Taking a minute to check it before the meeting ends is far less troublesome than assigning blame afterward.

Comparison of ecosystem access and collaboration capabilities

Whether a tool is useful or not depends largely on whether it can be integrated into your existing workflow. Otherwise, no matter how powerful the function is, it will just become another island that needs to be switched back and forth.

Tongyi Tingwu's access advantages are concentrated in the Alibaba ecosystem. The connection between DingTalk, Alibaba Cloud, and related office components is its selling point, and enterprise-level users especially benefit. Feishu Miaoji itself is a part of Feishu, and its linkage with Feishu documents, multi-dimensional tables, tasks, and calendars is native. This depth is difficult for other tools to match through later integration. iFlytek Hear is relatively more independent. It is not tied to a certain office platform. It is more versatile and can serve users of various platforms, but it also means that its deep integration into a specific collaboration system is not as deep as the first two. To put it simply, when choosing ecosystem access, first look at which office system your company mainly uses. It is often the easiest to choose according to that.

Privacy and data security cannot be ignored

Meeting content often involves business secrets, personnel information, and undisclosed decisions. If these are handled by cloud tools, data security is not an option but a bottom line. Behind all three are large technology companies, and they have corresponding enterprise-level solutions and statements on compliance and data protection. This is their basic foundation.

However, the specific details of data storage location, retention period, whether it is used for model training, and whether it can be deployed locally or privately vary greatly between different products and packages, and will change with policy and version adjustments. It is recommended to refer to the privacy terms and security white papers officially disclosed by each company, and do not draw conclusions based on impressions. For teams in sensitive industries, privatized deployment or local processing capabilities will be important screening items. It is best to confirm directly with the vendor before purchasing. The same goes for pricing. All three have free quotas and paid tiers. The specific packages and pricing are subject to the official public pages.

Suggestions for scenario-based selection

Put aside the parameters and go back to what exactly you want to use it for, and the choice will become much clearer.

When individual users take notes and organize online classes or podcasts, they pay more attention to the accuracy of transcription and the ease of organization. Tongyi Tingwu's all-round positioning and iFlytek Hear's solid transcription foundation are both worthy of consideration, depending on whether the material at hand is mainly meetings or audio and video. For daily team collaboration, if the company is already using Feishu, Feishu Miaoji is almost the default option and can be integrated into the workflow at zero cost; if the company is using DingTalk or Alibaba systems, the connection with Tongyi Tingwu will be smoother. In scenarios such as interviews and offline events that require high transcription quality and where the environment is not ideal, iFlytek Hear's long-term accumulation in speech recognition is usually more reassuring, and the supporting recording hardware is also a plus. For cross-language communication, you should focus on the multi-language and translation support of each company. According to public information, all three companies have relevant capabilities. It is recommended to try it out with real materials before making a decision.

Usage suggestions

No matter which one you choose in the end, there are a few lessons that can make it work better. Try to ensure the quality of the audio capture. A good microphone often improves accuracy more than worrying about which algorithm is stronger. For meetings with a lot of professional terms, names, and project codes, you can maintain a hot word list in advance. Most tools support it, which can significantly reduce typos. No matter how smart the AI summary and to-do are, it is worth manually scanning them before the meeting ends to confirm that there are no deviations in conclusions and division of labor. First use your free credit to run a few real meetings of your own, which is more straightforward than reading any review. After all, the only person who understands your way of speaking and work scenarios best is you. Technology is iterating rapidly, and today's comparison may need to be rewritten tomorrow, but the direction of handing over tedious records to machines and leaving judgment and decision-making to humans will probably not change.

FAQ

Among Tongyi Tingwu, Feishu Miaoji, and iFlytek Hear, which transcribes most accurately?

There is no absolute answer. Transcription accuracy is greatly affected by audio quality, accent, terminology, and environment. iFlytek Hear is backed by iFlytek's long-term accumulation in speech recognition, which is generally more reassuring in dialects and complex environments; Tongyi Tingwu and Feishu Miaoji are also usable in meetings with clear capture of standard Mandarin. It is recommended to compare them using your own real meetings.

Can I use Feishu Miaoji without Feishu?

Feishu Miaoji is part of the Feishu office suite. The best experience is built on using Feishu. If you don't use Feishu, its collaborative linkage advantages cannot be brought into play, and it is not very convenient to use it alone as a general transcription tool. In this case, Tongyi Tingwu or iFlytek Hear will be more suitable.

Is the meeting content in these tools safe?

Behind all three are large technology companies, all providing enterprise-level data protection solutions. However, details such as data storage location, retention period, whether it is used for training, and whether it can be deployed privately vary greatly and will be adjusted with versions. It is recommended that the privacy terms disclosed by each company prevail. Teams in sensitive industries should prioritize localized or privatized deployment capabilities.

Can AI-generated meeting minutes be used directly?

They can be used as a high-quality first draft, but it is not recommended to use them without checking. AI may still have biases in distinguishing speakers and identifying to-dos. It is recommended that key conclusions and division of responsibilities be reviewed manually. Spending a minute to confirm before the meeting ends is much easier than reworking afterward.

Is there any charge for the three tools? What is the price?

The three usually have free quotas and paid tiers, and payment is generally distinguished by length, function or team size. The specific packages and pricing are subject to the official public pages of each company. Specific numbers are not listed in this article to avoid becoming out of date. It is recommended to use the free quota to try it out first, and then consider paying after confirming that it meets your needs.